Synchronising muscles with heart
Download Our Free Sports Training Reports:

Enter your email address below: (As a bonus, we'll start sending you our free weekly newsletter, Sports Performance Bulletin.)
Synchronising Muscles With Heart: Should athletes attempt to synchronize muscular contractions with heart rates during workouts and competitive efforts? At first glance, the idea seems like a strange one, but scientific research suggests that it might be the right thing to do.
In theory, this alternation of heart and muscle contractions should work extremely well for cyclists, who would want to push down on a pedal just before each heart beat. However, things get complicated when you consider activities like running and walking. In those sports, the impact of footstrike creates a jarring effect on the heart which may actually help it expel more blood. An analogous situation would be banging your hand against a full bowl of water; the force of the impact sloshes water out of the bowl, just as the impact of a foot with the ground jostles blood out of the heart. Scientists call this mechanism the 'visceral-piston' effect.
For runners and walkers, then, it might be advantageous to coordinate footstrike and heart rate - letting a foot hit the ground each time the heart contracted. Anecdotal evidence supports this idea: elite athletes almost always use a footstrike rhythm of 180-190 steps per minute and a heart rate of 180-190 beats per minute during competition (although that doesn't mean that footstrike and heartbeat occur at precisely the same time). One problem with the theory is that muscular contractions tend to be fairly powerful during footstrike, which would tend to impede blood flow rather than assist
The cyclists also pedalled with whatever pedalling frequency they naturally preferred, and with a frequency which was 15 per cent higher than heart rate, 30 per cent higher than heart rate, 15 per cent below heart rate, and 30 per cent below heart rate. To give an example of how this worked, they used about 172 leg thrusts (86 revolutions) per minute while heart rate was 150 in order to pedal with a frequency which was 15-per cent higher than heart rate. In all cases, however, the cyclists' power output remained the same (as pedalling rate rose, pedal resistance decreased).
As it turned out, there was no special advantage to 'synching' heart rate with pedalling frequency; oxygen consumption remained about the same regardless of ped alling frequency. There was a trend, however, for the higher pedalling rates of 15 and 30 per cent above heart rate to be less efficient. The other pedalling rates (preferred, synched, 15, and 30 per cent below) were equally efficient.
One interesting aspect of the research was that the subjects' freely chosen pedalling rates were extremely close to their exercise heart rates. However, no physiological advantages were associated with such choices. One problem with the research is that the intensity utilized by the cyclists - about 50% V02max - was an extremely moderate, non-competitive one; bonuses in efficiency might occur if athletes tried 'synching' at higher effort levels. Also, the picture for runners remains unclear. More research will have to be conducted to determine whether runners should try to coordinate their footstrike rhythm with the thumping of their hearts. ('Effect of Cardiac-Locomotor Coupling on the
Metabolic Effciency of Pedalling, '' Canadian Joumal of Applied Physiology, vol. 18(4), pp. 379-391,
br> 1993 and Winning Rhythm, ' The Lancet, vol. 343, p.310, 1994)
This article was taken from the Peak Performance newsletter, the number one source of sports science, training and research. Click here to access these articles as soon as they are released to maximise your performance



































Comments